Product 03
Working prototypeJudicial Intelligence System
Intelligence for Justice. Judgment by Humans.
Advanced judicial research, case intelligence and judgment workflow infrastructure, designed to help courts analyse cases faster while keeping judicial decision-making firmly in human hands.
Built on DIM v1.0Case file
- Originating process
- Statement of defence
- Exhibits bundle
- Written addresses
Parties and the agreement in dispute; the events alleged.
Whether the obligation was breached and what relief follows.
The proper construction of the governing provision.
Neutral summaries only. Nothing here is a finding.
- Built on
- DIM v1.0
- Stage
- Prototype
- Decisions
- Human
- Record
- Audit trail
01How JIS works
JIS prepares: it reads, connects and drafts. It never decides. Watch a case file become structured reasoning for a Judge to confirm.
- 01
Read the file
The case file becomes a neutral view: the material facts, the issues and the questions of law, prepared for the Judge to review.
- 02
Connect authorities
Similar authorities are set side by side, with the reasons shown. Dissenting and contrary opinions appear beside every line of authority.
- 03
Weigh the reasoning
Possible reasoning pathways appear, with supporting and contrary authority. The Judge selects, challenges and confirms.
- 04
Draft, with sources
Structured drafts are built from the record and the Judge's confirmed reasoning, with a source behind every proposition.
- 05
Review and approve
Panel review, then approval by the authorised judges, recorded in an audit trail that cannot be quietly altered.
02What it does
From the case file to a drafted judgment, JIS prepares and organises — and the Judge reasons and decides.
- 01
Case intelligence
Neutral summaries, material facts and issues, prepared for the Judge to review.
- 02
Precedent analysis
Similar authorities compared side by side, with the reasons shown.
- 03
Legal research
Search across the court's own repository.
- 04
Dissent analysis
Dissenting and contrary opinions surfaced beside every line of authority.
- 05
Reasoning workspace
Possible reasoning pathways. The Judge selects, challenges and confirms.
- 06
Judgment drafting
Structured drafts built from the record, with a source behind every proposition.
- 07
Collegiate review
Panel review with comments, versions and a human reading record.
- 08
Secure approval
Approval by the authorised judges, then administrative review.
03Inside JIS
Case file
- Originating process
- Statement of defence
- Exhibits bundle
- Written addresses
Parties and the agreement in dispute; the events alleged.
Whether the obligation was breached and what relief follows.
The proper construction of the governing provision.
Neutral summaries only. Nothing here is a finding.
- 01
Case intelligence
The case file becomes a neutral, structured view: the material facts, the issues and the questions of law, ready for the Judge to review.
JISJudicial IntelligenceYour workspaceCasesResearchReasoningDraftsApprovals1Audit trailSentient Innovation LabIllustrative designMatter · DEMO/0001/2026Awaiting Judge reviewCase file
Documents- Originating process
- Statement of defence
- Exhibits bundle
- Written addresses
Prepared for the Judge’s reviewMaterial factsParties and the agreement in dispute; the events alleged.
IssuesWhether the obligation was breached and what relief follows.
Questions of lawThe proper construction of the governing provision.
Neutral summaries only. Nothing here is a finding.
- 03
A reasoning workspace
Possible reasoning pathways, with supporting and contrary authority. The Judge selects, challenges and confirms.
JISJudicial IntelligenceYour workspaceCasesResearchReasoningDraftsApprovals1Audit trailSentient Innovation LabIllustrative designReasoning workspaceJudge selectsPossible pathways
Pathway AConfirmed by the JudgeReads the provision according to its ordinary meaning.
Show me whyChallenge this reasoningPathway BReads the provision in light of its stated purpose.
Show me whyChallenge this reasoning - 04
Drafting, with sources
Structured drafts are built from the record and the Judge's confirmed reasoning, with a source behind every proposition.
JISJudicial IntelligenceYour workspaceCasesResearchReasoningDraftsApprovals1Audit trailSentient Innovation LabIllustrative designJudgment draft · v2Sources checkedA source behind every proposition
The claim concerns the proper construction of the agreement.Authority 1 · verifiedThe ordinary meaning of the term is not in dispute.Authority 4 · verifiedA contrary line of authority was considered and distinguished.Authority 2 · verifiedThe cited passage could not be confirmed.Unverified sourceA draft cannot be finalised while a source is unverified.
- 05
Review and approval
Panel review with a human reading record, then approval by the authorised judges, in an audit trail that cannot be quietly altered.
JISJudicial IntelligenceYour workspaceCasesResearchReasoningDraftsApprovals1Audit trailSentient Innovation LabIllustrative designCollegiate reviewHead-of-court review nextPanel approval
AJustice A
ApprovedBJustice B
ApprovedCJustice C
ReviewingDJustice D
PendingAudit trail- Draft v2 submitted for review#1
- Reading record completed by Justice A#2
- Approval recorded against draft v2#3
Every step is recorded and cannot be quietly altered.
04Principles
JIS assists judicial reasoning; it does not exercise judicial power.
- Principle 01
Judgment stays with judges
JIS never issues a judgment, determines liability or guilt, or approves a draft. Every consequential step is taken by an authenticated Judge.
- Principle 02
Traceable to source
Every legal proposition carries a reference to its authority and its verification status.
- Principle 03
Court-controlled
Designed to run within the court's own infrastructure. No case material is sent to a public AI service.
05The model underneath
Decision Intelligence Model v1.0
JIS is built on Sentient's Decision Intelligence Model: an engine that prepares options, with reasons, for authorised people to decide.
Explore the modelStatus
JIS is a working prototype, available for demonstration and evaluation with institutions. It is not yet offered for live production use.
A demonstration environment with fictional cases. Not for real judicial use.
06Explore
A designed demonstration of the JIS interface. A live demonstration is available on request.
Case file
- Originating process
- Statement of defence
- Exhibits bundle
- Written addresses
Parties and the agreement in dispute; the events alleged.
Whether the obligation was breached and what relief follows.
The proper construction of the governing provision.
Neutral summaries only. Nothing here is a finding.
We will walk you through the product, the model beneath it and how it could serve your institution.